Five panelists introduced key dimensions of moral discernment in their tradition: Kristina Mantasasvili, PhD candidate, Faculty of Theology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (Greece), spoke from an Orthodox perspective. She explained how the church responds to new questions and developments in society by drawing on sources and criteria from “the conscience of the church.” The conscience of the church is nurtured and informed through the holy scriptures, the sacred tradition, the liturgical life, especially the holy eucharist, the teachings of the church fathers and the ecumenical and local councils. Prof. Dr Rachel Muers, professor of Theology, University of Leeds (UK), highlighted that, in historical peace churches, “Peace can be seen as one moral issue but within the historical peace churches it’s more than that. It’s how we do our moral discernment.” Prof. Dr Steven R. Harmon, professor of Historical Theology, Gardner-Webb University School of Divinity, Boiling Springs, North Carolina (USA), reflected on the ecumenical horizon of moral discernment in his tradition: “Baptist freedom means a freedom to draw from the moral resources of the whole church, wherever those resources may be found.” H.E. Dr Polycarpus A. Aydin, metropolitan for the Archdiocese of the Netherlands of the Syriac Orthodox Church (Netherlands), spoke on the Syriac theologian Saint Ephrem, “He offers the church a dynamic understanding of scripture, the focus is on the salvation of the human person. Hence, the method is more therapeutic than judicial.” Prof. Dr Vimal Tirimanna, professor of Systematic Moral Theology at the Pontifical Alphonsian Academy, Rome, and at the National Seminary of Our Lady of Lanka, Kandy (Sri Lanka), underlined from a Catholic perspective the importance of the formation of the conscience of a person who is called to respond to challenges in diverse contexts. “The role of the magisterium to propose, not to impose.” |
No comments:
Post a Comment